Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
Article Info
Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose شماره 62

volume Number : 14
number In Volume : 4
issue Number : 62

Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 14، number In Volume 4، ، issue Number 62

Feeling in the musical components of Shams lyric poems with a look at phenomenological aesthetics

Farima Harsini , Homeyra Zomorodi (Author in Charge)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ghazal is one of the most widely read types of Persian poetry that expresses the experiences and mood of its narrator. Approaching the poet"s feelings through this statement is one of the purposes of reading such a poem. How to get acquainted with the poet"s emotional world through his sonnet is the subject of this research.

METHODOLOGY: The present study is a theoretical study and information collection is a library. Introducing Roman Ingarden"s aesthetic method, the author examines the sonnets of Maulana Jalaluddin"s Shams Divan and examines three sonnets for example.

FINDINGS: Although the poet of Shams lyric poems is the same as the poet of Masnavi in the real world, his feelings, worldview and speech in these two works are completely different from the two types. In Masnavi, Rumi is a patient teacher who expresses his teachings in the most explicit language; But in the lyric poems, his speech is of a different kind.

CONCLUSION: The aesthetic study of Shams"s sonnets shows the harmony between the poem and the poet"s feelings. Rumi is no longer a preacher in the sonnets of the sun who strives hard to guide others to make his words attractive and comprehensible to whatever art he knows. In fact, Rumi speaks only to express his worldview and description of his strange and different feelings and experiences, and he is not at all bound by the fact that his poetry is approved or even understood by others. The poet has achieved these lyric poems in such a way that he has no choice but to say them. Rumi has realized a world which, although it cannot be explained with words, has no means to express it except these words; After the word, a window is opened to his world, so that another can, even if it is a blink of an eye, look at his world.

Keyword
Ghazals of Shams Rumi , Phenomenological aesthetics , Roman Ingarden , Literary Criticis

Reference
  • Abdi, Ali. (2009). A Study of Shams, Growth of Persian Language and Literature Education, No. 90, pp.8-11.
  • Ahmadi, Babak. (2001). Text Structure and Interpretation, Tehran: Markaz Publisher, p.77.
  • Alavi Moghadam, Mahyar. (1998). Theories of Contemporary Literary Criticism, Tehran: Samt, p.25.
  • Baraheni, Reza. (1965). Gold in Copper, Tehran: Chehre, p.10.
  • Chjona, Wojciech. (2017). Roman Inagrden's Philosophy of Literature, Leiden: Brill.
  • Dufrenne, Mikel. (1973). The phenomenology of aesthetic experience. Northwestern University Press.
  • Ingarden, Roman. (1964). Artistic and Aesthetic Values, British Journal of Aesthetics.
  • Ingarden, Roman. (1973). The Cognition of Literary Work of Art, Tr. Ruth Ann Crowley and Kenneth R. Olson (Evanston: Northwestern University Press).
  • Ingarden, Roman. (1973). The literary work of art: An investigation on the borderlines of ontology, logic, and theory of literature. Northwestern University Press.
  • Jimenez, Mark. (2013). What is Aesthetics, Translated by Mohammad Reza Abolghasemi, Second Edition, Tehran: Mahi, p.95.
  • Kocay, Victor. (2002). Roman Ingarden’s Unique Conception of Aesthetic Objects. Phenomenology World-Wide. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 202-210.
  • Locke, J. (1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Mitscherling, Jeff. (1997). Roman Ingarden's Ontology and Aesthetics, University of Ottawa Press.
  • Pournamdarian, Taghi. (2007). A brief look at the poetry and thought of Rumi, Farhang, Nos. 63 and 64, pp.165-194.
  • Riska, Augustin. (1976). Language and Logic in the Work of Roman Ingarden. Ingardeniana. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 187-217.
  • Sahba, Forough. (2005). Fundamentals of Poetry Aesthetics, Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, Shiraz University, (3) 23, pp.90-109.
  • Smith, Barry. (1976). Historicity, Value and Mathematics, Analecta Husserliana, V. 4.
  • Volk, René. (1998). History of New Criticism, Translated by Arbab Shirani, Tehran: Niloufar.